| | | | | | |

Celeron J1900 vs Xeon E5502


Description
The J1900 is based on Silvermont architecture while the E5502 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the E5502 gets 22.3 k points.

Summarizing, the J1900 is 1.5 times faster than the E5502 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
30679
106a5
Core
Bay Trail-D
Gainestown
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.867 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.42 GHz
1.867 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
10 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2013
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
9.75k points
11.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.25k points
22.28k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J1900
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
4.58k
4.76k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
2.32k
3.15k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.72k
1.94k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
1.45k (x1.28)
TOTAL
9.75k
11.3k (x1.16)

Multithread

J1900

E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
17.16k
9.48k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
8.42k
6.3k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
3.86k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
2.64k (x1.83)
TOTAL
33.25k
22.28k (x0.67)

Performance/W
J1900
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
1716 points/W
118 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
842 points/W
79 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
622 points/W
48 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
3325 points/W
278 points/W

Performance/GHz
J1900
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
1893 points/GHz
2549 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/GHz
1685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
709 points/GHz
1038 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/GHz
779 points/GHz
TOTAL
4029 points/GHz
6051 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4