| | | | | | |

Celeron J1900 vs Pentium D 925


Description
The J1900 is based on Silvermont architecture while the 925 is based on NetBurst.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the 925 gets 14 k points.

Summarizing, the J1900 is 2.4 times faster than the 925. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
30679
f65
Core
Bay Trail-D
Presler
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.42 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
16+8 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2013
October 2006
Mean monothread perf.
9.75k points
7.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.25k points
14.03k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J1900
925
Test#1 (Integers)
1.24k
1.52k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
1.77k
2.95k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.65k
1.51k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.15k
0.82k (x0.71)
TOTAL
5.81k
6.79k (x1.17)

Multithread

J1900

925
Test#1 (Integers)
4.68k
2.98k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
6.67k
5.62k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.15k
2.87k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
0.82k (x0.56)
TOTAL
18.96k
12.29k (x0.65)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J1900
925
Test#1 (Integers)
4.58k
2.06k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
2.32k
3.32k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.72k
1.52k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
0.8k (x0.7)
TOTAL
9.75k
7.7k (x0.79)

Multithread

J1900

925
Test#1 (Integers)
17.16k
4k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
8.42k
6.32k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
2.91k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
0.81k (x0.56)
TOTAL
33.25k
14.03k (x0.42)

Performance/W
J1900
925
Test#1 (Integers)
1716 points/W
42 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
842 points/W
67 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
622 points/W
31 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
9 points/W
TOTAL
3325 points/W
148 points/W

Performance/GHz
J1900
925
Test#1 (Integers)
1893 points/GHz
686 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
709 points/GHz
507 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/GHz
266 points/GHz
TOTAL
4029 points/GHz
2565 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4