Celeron J1900 vs Core 2 Duo E6300
Description
The J1900 is based on Silvermont architecture while the E6300 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the E6300 gets 12 k points.
Summarizing, the J1900 is 2.8 times faster than the E6300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the E6300 gets 12 k points.
Summarizing, the J1900 is 2.8 times faster than the E6300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
30679
6f2
Core
Bay Trail-D
Conroe
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.866 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.42 GHz
1.866 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2013
July 2006
Mean monothread perf.
9.75k points
6.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.25k points
12.05k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J1900
E6300
Test#1 (Integers)
1.24k
1.82k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
1.77k
1.83k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.65k
1.86k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.15k
1.24k (x1.09)
TOTAL
5.81k
6.75k (x1.16)
Multithread
J1900
E6300
Test#1 (Integers)
4.68k
3.51k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
6.67k
3.59k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.15k
3.49k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
1.29k (x0.88)
TOTAL
18.96k
11.87k (x0.63)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J1900
E6300
Test#1 (Integers)
4.58k
2.09k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
2.32k
1.94k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.72k
1.79k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
1.05k (x0.93)
TOTAL
9.75k
6.87k (x0.71)
Multithread
J1900
E6300
Test#1 (Integers)
17.16k
3.65k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
8.42k
3.76k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
3.61k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
1.03k (x0.71)
TOTAL
33.25k
12.05k (x0.36)
Performance/W
J1900
E6300
Test#1 (Integers)
1716 points/W
56 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
842 points/W
58 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
622 points/W
55 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
3325 points/W
185 points/W
Performance/GHz
J1900
E6300
Test#1 (Integers)
1893 points/GHz
1121 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/GHz
1038 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
709 points/GHz
961 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/GHz
564 points/GHz
TOTAL
4029 points/GHz
3684 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4