Celeron J1900 vs Core i5-520M
Description
The J1900 is based on Silvermont architecture while the i5-520M is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the i5-520M gets 33.1 k points.
Summarizing, the J1900 is 1 times faster than the i5-520M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the i5-520M gets 33.1 k points.
Summarizing, the J1900 is 1 times faster than the i5-520M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
30679
20652
Core
Bay Trail-D
Arrandale
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.42 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
FC-PGA 988
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
10 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2013
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
9.75k points
15.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.25k points
33.14k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J1900
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
4.58k
6.67k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
2.32k
4.59k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.72k
2.49k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
2.18k (x1.92)
TOTAL
9.75k
15.93k (x1.63)
Multithread
J1900
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
17.16k
13.75k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
8.42k
10.03k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
6.67k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
2.68k (x1.86)
TOTAL
33.25k
33.14k (x1)
Performance/W
J1900
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
1716 points/W
393 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
842 points/W
287 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
622 points/W
191 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
3325 points/W
947 points/W
Performance/GHz
J1900
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
1893 points/GHz
2275 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/GHz
1567 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
709 points/GHz
849 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/GHz
742 points/GHz
TOTAL
4029 points/GHz
5433 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4