Celeron J1900 vs N3150

Description

The J1900 is based on Silvermont architecture while the N3150 is based on Airmont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the N3150 gets 31.8 k points.

Summarizing, the J1900 is 1 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs

J1900

N3150

CPUID

30679

406c3

Core

Bay Trail-D

Braswell

Architecture

Silvermont

Airmont

Base frecuency

2 GHz

1.6 GHz

Boost frecuency

2.42 GHz

2.08 GHz

Socket

BGA 1170

BGA1170

Cores/Threads

4/4

TDP

10 W

6 W

Cache L1 (d+i)

4x32+4x24 kB

Cache L2

2x1024 kB

Cache L3

0 kB

Date

November 2013

March 2015

Mean monothread perf.

9.75k points

9.21k points

Mean multithread perf.

33.25k points

31.8k points

Non-optimized benchmark

The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs

Monothread

J1900

N3150

Test#1 (Integers)

1.24k

1.07k (x0.86)

Test#2 (FP)

1.77k

1.74k (x0.98)

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

1.65k

1.5k (x0.91)

Test#1 (Memory)

1.15k

1.46k (x1.28)

TOTAL

5.81k

5.78k (x0.99)

Multithread

J1900

N3150

Test#1 (Integers)

4.68k

3.99k (x0.85)

Test#2 (FP)

6.67k

6.31k (x0.95)

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

6.15k

5.05k (x0.82)

Test#1 (Memory)

1.45k

2.65k (x1.82)

TOTAL

18.96k

18k (x0.95)

SSE3 optimized benchmark

The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.

Monothread

J1900

N3150

Test#1 (Integers)

4.58k

3.91k (x0.85)

Test#2 (FP)

2.32k

2.29k (x0.99)

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

1.72k

1.57k (x0.92)

Test#1 (Memory)

1.14k

1.44k (x1.27)

TOTAL

9.75k

9.21k (x0.94)

Multithread

J1900

N3150

Test#1 (Integers)

17.16k

14.78k (x0.86)

Test#2 (FP)

8.42k

8.62k (x1.02)

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

6.22k

5.84k (x0.94)

Test#1 (Memory)

1.44k

2.57k (x1.78)

TOTAL

33.25k

31.8k (x0.96)

Performance/W

J1900

N3150

Test#1 (Integers)

1716 points/W

2463 points/W

Test#2 (FP)

842 points/W

1437 points/W

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

622 points/W

973 points/W

Test#1 (Memory)

144 points/W

428 points/W

TOTAL

3325 points/W

5300 points/W

Performance/GHz

J1900

N3150

Test#1 (Integers)

1893 points/GHz

1880 points/GHz

Test#2 (FP)

957 points/GHz

1102 points/GHz

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

709 points/GHz

755 points/GHz

Test#1 (Memory)

470 points/GHz

692 points/GHz

TOTAL

4029 points/GHz

4429 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph

Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

Multithread performance graph

Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4