| | | | | | |

Celeron J1900 vs G1610T


Description
The J1900 is based on Silvermont architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.

Summarizing, the G1610T is 1.2 times faster than the J1900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
30679
306a9
Core
Bay Trail-D
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.42 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
2048 kB
Date
November 2013
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
9.75k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.25k points
38.59k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J1900
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
1.24k
2.34k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
1.77k
6.54k (x3.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.65k
3k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.15k
2.74k (x2.39)
TOTAL
5.81k
14.62k (x2.52)

Multithread

J1900

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.68k
4.67k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
6.67k
12.66k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.15k
5.95k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
2.53k (x1.74)
TOTAL
18.96k
25.8k (x1.36)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J1900
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.58k
7.87k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
2.32k
7.14k (x3.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.72k
3.04k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
2.79k (x2.45)
TOTAL
9.75k
20.84k (x2.14)

Multithread

J1900

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
17.16k
15.12k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
8.42k
14.05k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
5.94k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
3.48k (x2.41)
TOTAL
33.25k
38.59k (x1.16)

Performance/W
J1900
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
1716 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
842 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
622 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
3325 points/W
1103 points/W

Performance/GHz
J1900
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
1893 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
709 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
4029 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4