| | | | | | |

Celeron J1900 vs Athlon II M300


Description
The J1900 is based on Silvermont architecture while the M300 is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the M300 gets 17.7 k points.

Summarizing, the J1900 is 1.9 times faster than the M300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
30679
100f62
Core
Bay Trail-D
Caspian
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.42 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
Socket S1G3
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
November 2013
October 2009
Mean monothread perf.
9.75k points
9.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.25k points
17.73k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J1900
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
4.58k
2.66k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
2.32k
3.84k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.72k
1.97k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
1.1k (x0.97)
TOTAL
9.75k
9.57k (x0.98)

Multithread

J1900

M300
Test#1 (Integers)
17.16k
5.04k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
8.42k
7.46k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
3.75k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
1.48k (x1.02)
TOTAL
33.25k
17.73k (x0.53)

Performance/W
J1900
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
1716 points/W
144 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
842 points/W
213 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
622 points/W
107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
3325 points/W
506 points/W

Performance/GHz
J1900
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
1893 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/GHz
1921 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
709 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/GHz
550 points/GHz
TOTAL
4029 points/GHz
4784 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4