| | | | | | |

Celeron G530 vs Core i5-1035G4


Description
The G530 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G530 gets a score of 27 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 87.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 3.2 times faster than the G530. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
706e5
Core
Sandy Bridge
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2011
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
18.1k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
26.95k points
142.69k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G530
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
7.16k
7.07k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
5.62k
10.55k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.85k
5.27k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.46k
5.66k (x2.3)
TOTAL
18.1k
28.56k (x1.58)

Multithread

G530

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.78k
25.28k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
9.28k
37.48k (x4.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.59k
17.77k (x4.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.3k
6.92k (x3.01)
TOTAL
26.95k
87.45k (x3.24)

Performance/W
G530
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
181 points/W
1685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
143 points/W
2499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55 points/W
1185 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
35 points/W
461 points/W
TOTAL
415 points/W
5830 points/W

Performance/GHz
G530
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2985 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2343 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1187 points/GHz
1424 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1026 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
7541 points/GHz
7718 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4