Celeron G530 vs Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Description
The G530 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 4200+ is based on K8.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G530 gets a score of 27 k points while the 4200+ gets 17.9 k points.
Summarizing, the G530 is 1.5 times faster than the 4200+. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G530 gets a score of 27 k points while the 4200+ gets 17.9 k points.
Summarizing, the G530 is 1.5 times faster than the 4200+. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
60fb1
Core
Sandy Bridge
Brisbane
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
Socket AM2
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2011
January 2007
Mean monothread perf.
18.1k points
8.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
26.95k points
17.94k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G530
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
7.16k
2.77k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
5.62k
4k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.85k
1.92k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.46k
0.16k (x0.07)
TOTAL
18.1k
8.86k (x0.49)
Multithread
G530
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
11.78k
5.81k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
9.28k
7.85k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.59k
3.98k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.3k
0.31k (x0.13)
TOTAL
26.95k
17.94k (x0.67)
Performance/W
G530
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
181 points/W
89 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
143 points/W
121 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
55 points/W
61 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
35 points/W
5 points/W
TOTAL
415 points/W
276 points/W
Performance/GHz
G530
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
2985 points/GHz
1260 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2343 points/GHz
1820 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1187 points/GHz
872 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1026 points/GHz
74 points/GHz
TOTAL
7541 points/GHz
4025 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4