| | | | | | |

Celeron G3900TE vs Pentium E5500


Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the E5500 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 31.6 k points while the E5500 gets 20.7 k points.

Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1.5 times faster than the E5500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
1067a
Core
Skylake-S
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
0 kB
Date
December 2015
April 2010
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
12.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
20.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G3900TE
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
2.56k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
6.54k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
2.76k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
0.91k (x0.27)
TOTAL
18.59k
12.77k (x0.69)

Multithread

G3900TE

E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
4.32k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
18.16k
10.8k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
4.7k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.5k
0.87k (x0.25)
TOTAL
31.59k
20.69k (x0.65)

Performance/W
G3900TE
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
127 points/W
66 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
519 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
156 points/W
72 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
13 points/W
TOTAL
903 points/W
318 points/W

Performance/GHz
G3900TE
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
1028 points/GHz
914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4259 points/GHz
2335 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
985 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1461 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
8084 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4