| | | | | | |

Celeron G3900TE vs Xeon X5670


Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the X5670 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.

Summarizing, the X5670 is 2.3 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
206c2
Core
Skylake-S
Westmere-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
6 /6
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
12288 kB
Date
December 2015
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
20.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
115.4k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3900TE
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
8.56k
8.35k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
5.58k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.17k
3.32k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.35k
3k (x0.9)
TOTAL
27.33k
20.26k (x0.74)

Multithread

G3900TE

X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
16.42k
49.72k (x3.03)
Test#2 (FP)
23.61k
35.19k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
21.88k (x3.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
8.6k (x2.42)
TOTAL
49.34k
115.4k (x2.34)

Performance/W
G3900TE
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
469 points/W
523 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
675 points/W
370 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164 points/W
230 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
1410 points/W
1215 points/W

Performance/GHz
G3900TE
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
3724 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
1675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1455 points/GHz
900 points/GHz
TOTAL
11885 points/GHz
6078 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4