| | | | | | |

Celeron G3900TE vs Xeon E5-2697 v2


Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 617.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 12.5 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
306e4
Core
Skylake-S
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/2
12 /24
TDP
35 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
30720 kB
Date
December 2015
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
633.14k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G3900TE
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
3.44k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
9.54k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
4.21k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
3.94k (x1.17)
TOTAL
18.59k
21.13k (x1.14)

Multithread

G3900TE

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
73.17k (x16.44)
Test#2 (FP)
18.16k
230.83k (x12.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
107.14k (x19.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.5k
7.99k (x2.28)
TOTAL
31.59k
419.12k (x13.27)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3900TE
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
8.56k
10.64k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
9.53k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.17k
4.12k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.35k
3.62k (x1.08)
TOTAL
27.33k
27.91k (x1.02)

Multithread

G3900TE

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
16.42k
252.69k (x15.39)
Test#2 (FP)
23.61k
238.68k (x10.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
115.5k (x20.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
10.98k (x3.09)
TOTAL
49.34k
617.84k (x12.52)

Performance/W
G3900TE
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
469 points/W
1944 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
675 points/W
1836 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164 points/W
888 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
1410 points/W
4753 points/W

Performance/GHz
G3900TE
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3724 points/GHz
3041 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
2722 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1178 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1455 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
TOTAL
11885 points/GHz
7973 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4