| | | | | | |

Celeron G3900TE vs Xeon E5-2620 v4


Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 182.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 3.7 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
406f1
Core
Skylake-S
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/16
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
20480 kB
Date
December 2015
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
237.83k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G3900TE
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
2.6k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
7.55k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
2.61k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
2.03k (x0.6)
TOTAL
18.59k
14.79k (x0.8)

Multithread

G3900TE

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
17.41k (x3.91)
Test#2 (FP)
18.16k
75.46k (x4.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
26.25k (x4.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.5k
4.65k (x1.33)
TOTAL
31.59k
123.78k (x3.92)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3900TE
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
8.56k
8.22k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
12.06k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.17k
4.01k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.35k
2.89k (x0.86)
TOTAL
27.33k
27.18k (x0.99)

Multithread

G3900TE

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.42k
61.34k (x3.74)
Test#2 (FP)
23.61k
90.21k (x3.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
26.2k (x4.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
4.62k (x1.3)
TOTAL
49.34k
182.37k (x3.7)

Performance/W
G3900TE
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
469 points/W
722 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
675 points/W
1061 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
54 points/W
TOTAL
1410 points/W
2146 points/W

Performance/GHz
G3900TE
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3724 points/GHz
2739 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
4021 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1455 points/GHz
963 points/GHz
TOTAL
11885 points/GHz
9059 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4