| | | | | | |

Celeron G3900TE vs Pentium N3530


Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the N3530 is based on Silvermont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the N3530 gets 34.6 k points.

Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1.4 times faster than the N3530. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
30678
Core
Skylake-S
Bay Trail-M
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.58 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
kB
Date
December 2015
February 2014
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
10.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
34.57k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3900TE
N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
8.56k
4.86k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
2.5k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.17k
1.82k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.35k
1.26k (x0.38)
TOTAL
27.33k
10.44k (x0.38)

Multithread

G3900TE

N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
16.42k
17.22k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
23.61k
8.89k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
6.89k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
1.57k (x0.44)
TOTAL
49.34k
34.57k (x0.7)

Performance/W
G3900TE
N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
469 points/W
2460 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
675 points/W
1269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164 points/W
984 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
225 points/W
TOTAL
1410 points/W
4938 points/W

Performance/GHz
G3900TE
N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
3724 points/GHz
1884 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
967 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
707 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1455 points/GHz
488 points/GHz
TOTAL
11885 points/GHz
4047 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4