Celeron G3900TE vs Core 2 Duo E8200
Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the E8200 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1.9 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1.9 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
10676
Core
Skylake-S
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6144 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
0 kB
Date
December 2015
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
15.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
25.39k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3900TE
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
8.56k
3k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
6.62k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.17k
2.55k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.35k
3.6k (x1.08)
TOTAL
27.33k
15.77k (x0.58)
Multithread
G3900TE
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
16.42k
5.83k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
23.61k
12.64k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
4.97k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
1.95k (x0.55)
TOTAL
49.34k
25.39k (x0.51)
Performance/W
G3900TE
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
469 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
675 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164 points/W
76 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
1410 points/W
391 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3900TE
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
3724 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
2481 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1455 points/GHz
1349 points/GHz
TOTAL
11885 points/GHz
5912 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4