Celeron G3900TE vs Core i7-950
Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-950 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the i7-950 gets 76.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-950 is 1.5 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the i7-950 gets 76.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-950 is 1.5 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
106a5
Core
Skylake-S
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.066 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
8192 kB
Date
December 2015
June 2009
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
19.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
76.29k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3900TE
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
8.56k
8.01k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
5.38k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.17k
3.11k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.35k
2.96k (x0.88)
TOTAL
27.33k
19.46k (x0.71)
Multithread
G3900TE
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
16.42k
31.53k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
23.61k
24.16k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
15.84k (x2.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
4.75k (x1.34)
TOTAL
49.34k
76.29k (x1.55)
Performance/W
G3900TE
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
469 points/W
243 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
675 points/W
186 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164 points/W
122 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
1410 points/W
587 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3900TE
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
3724 points/GHz
2403 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
1614 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
934 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1455 points/GHz
888 points/GHz
TOTAL
11885 points/GHz
5839 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4