| | | | | | |

Celeron G3900TE vs Core i7-4720HQ


Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-4720HQ is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 31.6 k points while the i7-4720HQ gets 71.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4720HQ is 2.3 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
306c3
Core
Skylake-S
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
35 W
47 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
6144 kB
Date
December 2015
January 2015
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
40.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
132.35k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G3900TE
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
3.79k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
9.64k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
4.34k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
3.76k (x1.12)
TOTAL
18.59k
21.53k (x1.16)

Multithread

G3900TE

i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
11.66k (x2.62)
Test#2 (FP)
18.16k
37.71k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
16.38k (x2.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.5k
5.94k (x1.7)
TOTAL
31.59k
71.69k (x2.27)

Performance/W
G3900TE
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
127 points/W
248 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
519 points/W
802 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
156 points/W
348 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
126 points/W
TOTAL
903 points/W
1525 points/W

Performance/GHz
G3900TE
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1028 points/GHz
1053 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4259 points/GHz
2677 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1206 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1461 points/GHz
1044 points/GHz
TOTAL
8084 points/GHz
5980 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4