Celeron G3900TE vs Core i5-4590S
Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-4590S is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 31.6 k points while the i5-4590S gets 78.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-4590S is 2.5 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 31.6 k points while the i5-4590S gets 78.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-4590S is 2.5 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
306c3
Core
Skylake-S
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
6144 kB
Date
December 2015
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
34.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
117.77k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G3900TE
i5-4590S
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
4.24k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
10.54k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
4.76k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
4.29k (x1.28)
TOTAL
18.59k
23.84k (x1.28)
Multithread
G3900TE
i5-4590S
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
15.01k (x3.37)
Test#2 (FP)
18.16k
37.75k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
17.12k (x3.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.5k
8.48k (x2.42)
TOTAL
31.59k
78.37k (x2.48)
Performance/W
G3900TE
i5-4590S
Test#1 (Integers)
127 points/W
231 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
519 points/W
581 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
156 points/W
263 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
130 points/W
TOTAL
903 points/W
1206 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3900TE
i5-4590S
Test#1 (Integers)
1028 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4259 points/GHz
2850 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1287 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1461 points/GHz
1159 points/GHz
TOTAL
8084 points/GHz
6442 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4