| | | | | | |

Celeron G3900TE vs Core i5-2410M


Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the i5-2410M gets 36.9 k points.

Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1.3 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
206a7
Core
Skylake-S
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2015
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
20.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
38.68k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G3900TE
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
2.38k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
6.6k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
3.48k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
3.16k (x0.94)
TOTAL
18.59k
15.62k (x0.84)

Multithread

G3900TE

i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
5.49k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
18.16k
14.39k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
8.39k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.5k
3.09k (x0.88)
TOTAL
31.59k
31.35k (x0.99)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3900TE
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
8.56k
7.98k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
6.55k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.17k
3.28k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.35k
2.7k (x0.81)
TOTAL
27.33k
20.52k (x0.75)

Multithread

G3900TE

i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
16.42k
13.66k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
23.61k
13.17k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
7.05k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
3.02k (x0.85)
TOTAL
49.34k
36.9k (x0.75)

Performance/W
G3900TE
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
469 points/W
390 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
675 points/W
376 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164 points/W
202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
1410 points/W
1054 points/W

Performance/GHz
G3900TE
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
3724 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
2258 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1132 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1455 points/GHz
933 points/GHz
TOTAL
11885 points/GHz
7075 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4