| | | | | | |

Celeron G3900TE vs Core i5-1035G1


Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 141.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 2.9 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
706e5
Core
Skylake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
6144 kB
Date
December 2015
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
171.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G3900TE
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
3.88k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
14.98k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
9.7k (x3.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
8.6k (x2.56)
TOTAL
18.59k
37.15k (x2)

Multithread

G3900TE

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
14.61k (x3.28)
Test#2 (FP)
18.16k
54.9k (x3.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
27.58k (x5.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.5k
5.04k (x1.44)
TOTAL
31.59k
102.13k (x3.23)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3900TE
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
8.56k
12.89k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
18.55k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.17k
9.93k (x3.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.35k
9.54k (x2.85)
TOTAL
27.33k
50.91k (x1.86)

Multithread

G3900TE

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
16.42k
50.06k (x3.05)
Test#2 (FP)
23.61k
66.1k (x2.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
20.24k (x3.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
5.51k (x1.55)
TOTAL
49.34k
141.91k (x2.88)

Performance/W
G3900TE
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
469 points/W
3337 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
675 points/W
4407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164 points/W
1349 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
368 points/W
TOTAL
1410 points/W
9461 points/W

Performance/GHz
G3900TE
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3724 points/GHz
3580 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
5153 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
2759 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1455 points/GHz
2650 points/GHz
TOTAL
11885 points/GHz
14142 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4