| | | | | | |

Celeron G3900TE vs J4105


Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.2 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
706a1
Core
Skylake-S
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
0 kB
Date
December 2015
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
61.49k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G3900TE
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
1.68k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
5.29k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
2.75k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
3.44k (x1.03)
TOTAL
18.59k
13.16k (x0.71)

Multithread

G3900TE

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
6.39k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
18.16k
20.02k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
10.22k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.5k
4.94k (x1.41)
TOTAL
31.59k
41.57k (x1.32)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3900TE
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
8.56k
4.9k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
7.26k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.17k
2.75k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.35k
3.32k (x0.99)
TOTAL
27.33k
18.22k (x0.67)

Multithread

G3900TE

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
16.42k
18.84k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
23.61k
27.45k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
10.35k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
4.85k (x1.37)
TOTAL
49.34k
61.49k (x1.25)

Performance/W
G3900TE
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
469 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
675 points/W
2745 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164 points/W
1035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
485 points/W
TOTAL
1410 points/W
6149 points/W

Performance/GHz
G3900TE
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
3724 points/GHz
1958 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
2902 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1455 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
11885 points/GHz
7289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4