| | | | | | |

Celeron G3900TE vs G1610T


Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.

Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1.3 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
306a9
Core
Skylake-S
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
2048 kB
Date
December 2015
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
38.59k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G3900TE
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
2.34k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
6.54k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
3k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
2.74k (x0.82)
TOTAL
18.59k
14.62k (x0.79)

Multithread

G3900TE

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
4.67k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
18.16k
12.66k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
5.95k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.5k
2.53k (x0.72)
TOTAL
31.59k
25.8k (x0.82)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3900TE
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.56k
7.87k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
7.14k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.17k
3.04k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.35k
2.79k (x0.83)
TOTAL
27.33k
20.84k (x0.76)

Multithread

G3900TE

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.42k
15.12k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
23.61k
14.05k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
5.94k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
3.48k (x0.98)
TOTAL
49.34k
38.59k (x0.78)

Performance/W
G3900TE
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
469 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
675 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
1410 points/W
1103 points/W

Performance/GHz
G3900TE
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3724 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1455 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
11885 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4