| | | | | | |

Celeron G3900TE vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the 2400G gets 183 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 3.7 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
810f10
Core
Skylake-S
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
4096 kB
Date
December 2015
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
198.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G3900TE
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
3.8k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
17.38k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
5.17k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
3.16k (x0.94)
TOTAL
18.59k
29.52k (x1.59)

Multithread

G3900TE

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
15.28k (x3.43)
Test#2 (FP)
18.16k
76.44k (x4.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
27.48k (x5.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.5k
3.02k (x0.86)
TOTAL
31.59k
122.2k (x3.87)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3900TE
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
8.56k
13.95k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
20.7k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.17k
5.33k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.35k
3.03k (x0.9)
TOTAL
27.33k
43.01k (x1.57)

Multithread

G3900TE

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.42k
58.56k (x3.57)
Test#2 (FP)
23.61k
92.95k (x3.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
28.55k (x4.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
2.98k (x0.84)
TOTAL
49.34k
183.04k (x3.71)

Performance/W
G3900TE
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
469 points/W
901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
675 points/W
1430 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164 points/W
439 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
1410 points/W
2816 points/W

Performance/GHz
G3900TE
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3724 points/GHz
3577 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
5308 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1455 points/GHz
776 points/GHz
TOTAL
11885 points/GHz
11028 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4