| | | | | | |

Celeron G3900TE vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.6 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
100fa0
Core
Skylake-S
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/6
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
6144 kB
Date
December 2015
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
80.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G3900TE
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
1.98k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
4.57k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
2.57k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
3.51k (x1.05)
TOTAL
18.59k
12.64k (x0.68)

Multithread

G3900TE

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
11.86k (x2.67)
Test#2 (FP)
18.16k
27.4k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
15.39k (x2.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.5k
3.46k (x0.99)
TOTAL
31.59k
58.11k (x1.84)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3900TE
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.56k
5.17k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
5.33k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.17k
2.76k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.35k
3.51k (x1.05)
TOTAL
27.33k
16.77k (x0.61)

Multithread

G3900TE

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.42k
29.82k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
23.61k
30.79k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
15.88k (x2.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
3.69k (x1.04)
TOTAL
49.34k
80.19k (x1.63)

Performance/W
G3900TE
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
469 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
675 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
1410 points/W
844 points/W

Performance/GHz
G3900TE
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3724 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1455 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
11885 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4