Celeron G1610T vs Pentium E5500
Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E5500 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 25.8 k points while the E5500 gets 20.7 k points.
Summarizing, the G1610T is 1.2 times faster than the E5500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 25.8 k points while the E5500 gets 20.7 k points.
Summarizing, the G1610T is 1.2 times faster than the E5500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
1067a
Core
Ivy Bridge
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
0 kB
Date
December 2012
April 2010
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
12.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
20.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G1610T
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
2.56k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
6.54k
6.54k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
2.76k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
0.91k (x0.33)
TOTAL
14.62k
12.77k (x0.87)
Multithread
G1610T
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.67k
4.32k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
12.66k
10.8k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.95k
4.7k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
0.87k (x0.35)
TOTAL
25.8k
20.69k (x0.8)
Performance/W
G1610T
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
133 points/W
66 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
362 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
72 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
13 points/W
TOTAL
737 points/W
318 points/W
Performance/GHz
G1610T
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
1019 points/GHz
914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2842 points/GHz
2335 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1305 points/GHz
985 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1191 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
6357 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4