Celeron G1610T vs Xeon W3530
Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the W3530 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.
Summarizing, the W3530 is 1.9 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.
Summarizing, the W3530 is 1.9 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
106a5
Core
Ivy Bridge
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
4 /4
TDP
35 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
8192 kB
Date
December 2012
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
18.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
72.77k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
7.51k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
4.93k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
3.02k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
2.74k (x0.98)
TOTAL
20.84k
18.2k (x0.87)
Multithread
G1610T
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
31.33k (x2.07)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
23.11k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
15.78k (x2.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
2.55k (x0.73)
TOTAL
38.59k
72.77k (x1.89)
Performance/W
G1610T
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
241 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
178 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
20 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
560 points/W
Performance/GHz
G1610T
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
2450 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
1608 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
892 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
5935 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4