| | | | | | |

Celeron G1610T vs Xeon E5504


Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E5504 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the E5504 gets 42 k points.

Summarizing, the E5504 is 1.1 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
106a5
Core
Ivy Bridge
Gainestown
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
4 /4
TDP
35 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
4096 kB
Date
December 2012
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
10.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
41.95k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
4.57k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
3.07k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
1.85k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
1.43k (x0.51)
TOTAL
20.84k
10.92k (x0.52)

Multithread

G1610T

E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
19.07k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
12.52k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
7.97k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
2.39k (x0.69)
TOTAL
38.59k
41.95k (x1.09)

Performance/W
G1610T
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
238 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
100 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
524 points/W

Performance/GHz
G1610T
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
2287 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
1535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
926 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
713 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
5460 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4