Celeron G1610T vs Xeon E5472
Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E5472 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the E5472 gets 48.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5472 is 1.3 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the E5472 gets 48.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5472 is 1.3 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
10676
Core
Ivy Bridge
Harpertown
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA-771
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x6144 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
kB
Date
December 2012
November 2007
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
16.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
48.62k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G1610T
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
2.29k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
6.54k
5.85k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
2.44k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
4.81k (x1.76)
TOTAL
14.62k
15.39k (x1.05)
Multithread
G1610T
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
4.67k
9.06k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
12.66k
23.09k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.95k
9.7k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
2.53k (x1)
TOTAL
25.8k
44.38k (x1.72)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
2.88k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
6.36k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
2.55k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
4.83k (x1.73)
TOTAL
20.84k
16.62k (x0.8)
Multithread
G1610T
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
11.19k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
24.85k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
10.04k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
2.54k (x0.73)
TOTAL
38.59k
48.62k (x1.26)
Performance/W
G1610T
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
140 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
311 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
125 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
32 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
608 points/W
Performance/GHz
G1610T
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
961 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
2119 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
850 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
1610 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
5539 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4