| | | | | | |

Celeron G1610T vs Pentium 4417U


Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 4417U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the 4417U gets 41.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 4417U is 1.1 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
806ea
Core
Ivy Bridge
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
2048 kB
Date
December 2012
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
24.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
41.15k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
7.94k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
11.35k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
2.39k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
2.8k (x1)
TOTAL
20.84k
24.49k (x1.18)

Multithread

G1610T

4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
13.1k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
21.1k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
4.49k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
2.46k (x0.71)
TOTAL
38.59k
41.15k (x1.07)

Performance/W
G1610T
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
873 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
1407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
2743 points/W

Performance/GHz
G1610T
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
3452 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
4937 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
1041 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
1217 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
10646 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4