Celeron G1610T vs Core 2 Duo E8500
Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E8500 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the E8500 gets 31.2 k points.
Summarizing, the G1610T is 1.2 times faster than the E8500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the E8500 gets 31.2 k points.
Summarizing, the G1610T is 1.2 times faster than the E8500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
1067a
Core
Ivy Bridge
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.167 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6144 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
kB
Date
December 2012
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
19.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
31.21k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
E8500
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
3.65k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
8.07k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
3.15k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
4.59k (x1.65)
TOTAL
20.84k
19.46k (x0.93)
Multithread
G1610T
E8500
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
7.11k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
15.79k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
6.2k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
2.13k (x0.61)
TOTAL
38.59k
31.21k (x0.81)
Performance/W
G1610T
E8500
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
109 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
95 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
480 points/W
Performance/GHz
G1610T
E8500
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
1151 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
2549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
1450 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
6144 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4