Celeron G1610T vs Core 2 Duo E6600
Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E6600 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the E6600 gets 16.1 k points.
Summarizing, the G1610T is 2.4 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the E6600 gets 16.1 k points.
Summarizing, the G1610T is 2.4 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
6f6
Core
Ivy Bridge
Conroe
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
0 kB
Date
December 2012
July 2006
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
9.99k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
16.12k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G1610T
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
2.38k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
6.54k
2.39k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
2.39k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
2.79k (x1.02)
TOTAL
14.62k
9.95k (x0.68)
Multithread
G1610T
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.67k
4.68k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
12.66k
4.68k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.95k
4.69k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
1.8k (x0.71)
TOTAL
25.8k
15.86k (x0.61)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
2.7k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
2.42k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
2.41k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
2.46k (x0.88)
TOTAL
20.84k
9.99k (x0.48)
Multithread
G1610T
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
5.19k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
4.55k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
4.6k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
1.78k (x0.51)
TOTAL
38.59k
16.12k (x0.42)
Performance/W
G1610T
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
80 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
70 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
71 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
248 points/W
Performance/GHz
G1610T
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
1125 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
1009 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
1025 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
4164 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4