Celeron G1610T vs Core i7-640LM
Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-640LM is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the i7-640LM gets 31.7 k points.
Summarizing, the G1610T is 1.2 times faster than the i7-640LM. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the i7-640LM gets 31.7 k points.
Summarizing, the G1610T is 1.2 times faster than the i7-640LM. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
20655
Core
Ivy Bridge
Calpella
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1288
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
35 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
4096 kB
Date
December 2012
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
16.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
31.74k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
i7-640LM
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
7.01k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
4.58k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
2.73k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
2.03k (x0.73)
TOTAL
20.84k
16.35k (x0.78)
Multithread
G1610T
i7-640LM
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
12.93k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
10.21k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
6.22k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
2.37k (x0.68)
TOTAL
38.59k
31.74k (x0.82)
Performance/W
G1610T
i7-640LM
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
517 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
409 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
249 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
95 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
1269 points/W
Performance/GHz
G1610T
i7-640LM
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
2627 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
1024 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
762 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
6130 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4