| | | | | | |

Celeron G1610T vs Core i7-860


Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-860 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the i7-860 gets 75.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-860 is 2 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
106e5
Core
Ivy Bridge
Lynnfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1156
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
8192 kB
Date
December 2012
September 2009
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
19.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
75.43k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G1610T
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
2.15k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
6.54k
4.87k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
2.82k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
3.13k (x1.14)
TOTAL
14.62k
12.97k (x0.89)

Multithread

G1610T

i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
4.67k
8.24k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
12.66k
21.63k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.95k
14.65k (x2.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
5.02k (x1.99)
TOTAL
25.8k
49.54k (x1.92)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
7.87k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
5.25k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
2.94k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
3.13k (x1.12)
TOTAL
20.84k
19.19k (x0.92)

Multithread

G1610T

i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
31.5k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
23.47k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
15.47k (x2.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
4.98k (x1.43)
TOTAL
38.59k
75.43k (x1.95)

Performance/W
G1610T
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
332 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
247 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
163 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
52 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
794 points/W

Performance/GHz
G1610T
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
2271 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
1514 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
847 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
902 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
5534 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4