Celeron G1610T vs Core i5-3337U
Description
Both models G1610T and i5-3337U are based on Ivy Bridge architecture.
"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 25.8 k points while the i5-3337U gets 31.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3337U is 1.2 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 25.8 k points while the i5-3337U gets 31.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3337U is 1.2 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
306a9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2/2
2 /2
TDP
35 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2012
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
23.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
48.3k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G1610T
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
2.55k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
6.54k
7.24k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
3.26k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
3.37k (x1.23)
TOTAL
14.62k
16.42k (x1.12)
Multithread
G1610T
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.67k
5.03k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
12.66k
14.79k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.95k
7.37k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
4.53k (x1.79)
TOTAL
25.8k
31.72k (x1.23)
Performance/W
G1610T
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
133 points/W
296 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
362 points/W
870 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
434 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
267 points/W
TOTAL
737 points/W
1866 points/W
Performance/GHz
G1610T
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
1019 points/GHz
944 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2842 points/GHz
2682 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1305 points/GHz
1206 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1191 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
TOTAL
6357 points/GHz
6080 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4