| | | | | | |

Celeron G1610T vs Core i5-3317U


Description
Both models G1610T and i5-3317U are based on Ivy Bridge architecture.

"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the i5-3317U gets 45.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3317U is 1.2 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
306a9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2/2
2 /2
TDP
35 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2012
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
17.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
41.31k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G1610T
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
2.5k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
6.54k
7.18k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
3.19k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
3.41k (x1.24)
TOTAL
14.62k
16.27k (x1.11)

Multithread

G1610T

i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.67k
4.93k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
12.66k
15.72k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.95k
7.53k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
4.21k (x1.67)
TOTAL
25.8k
32.39k (x1.26)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
8.38k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
7.76k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
3.33k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
3.41k (x1.22)
TOTAL
20.84k
22.88k (x1.1)

Multithread

G1610T

i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
16.56k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
16.79k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
7.85k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
4.02k (x1.16)
TOTAL
38.59k
45.23k (x1.17)

Performance/W
G1610T
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
974 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
988 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
462 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
237 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
2660 points/W

Performance/GHz
G1610T
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
3225 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
2984 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
1281 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
8801 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4