Celeron G1610T vs Core i7-7020U
Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-7020U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the i7-7020U gets 57.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7020U is 1.5 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the i7-7020U gets 57.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7020U is 1.5 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
806ea
Core
Ivy Bridge
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2012
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
33.63k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
73.15k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G1610T
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
2.3k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
6.54k
8.36k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
2.75k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
4.64k (x1.69)
TOTAL
14.62k
18.04k (x1.23)
Multithread
G1610T
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.67k
4.74k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
12.66k
17.96k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.95k
6.95k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
4.95k (x1.96)
TOTAL
25.8k
34.61k (x1.34)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
8.18k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
11.67k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
2.97k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
4.68k (x1.68)
TOTAL
20.84k
27.5k (x1.32)
Multithread
G1610T
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
17.51k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
27.61k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
7.39k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
4.78k (x1.37)
TOTAL
38.59k
57.3k (x1.48)
Performance/W
G1610T
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
1841 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
493 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
3820 points/W
Performance/GHz
G1610T
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
3555 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
5073 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
1293 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
2034 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
11956 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4