Celeron G1610T vs N4120
Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the N4120 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the N4120 gets 46.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N4120 is 1.2 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the N4120 gets 46.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N4120 is 1.2 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
706a8
Core
Ivy Bridge
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
0 kB
Date
December 2012
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
18.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
46.17k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
5.94k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
7.51k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
2.78k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
2.67k (x0.96)
TOTAL
20.84k
18.9k (x0.91)
Multithread
G1610T
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
15.02k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
19.77k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
7.71k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
3.67k (x1.05)
TOTAL
38.59k
46.17k (x1.2)
Performance/W
G1610T
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
2503 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
3294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
1286 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
611 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
7694 points/W
Performance/GHz
G1610T
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
2286 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
2887 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
1069 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
1029 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
7271 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4