Celeron G1610T vs N4100
Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the N4100 is 1.1 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the N4100 is 1.1 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
706a1
Core
Ivy Bridge
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1090
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
kB
Date
December 2012
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
17.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
40.57k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
4.72k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
6.99k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
2.69k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
2.81k (x1.01)
TOTAL
20.84k
17.21k (x0.83)
Multithread
G1610T
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
12.54k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
17.99k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
6.71k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
3.33k (x0.96)
TOTAL
38.59k
40.57k (x1.05)
Performance/W
G1610T
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
2090 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
2999 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
555 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
6762 points/W
Performance/GHz
G1610T
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
2914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
1171 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
7172 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4