Celeron G1610T vs J3455
Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the J3455 is based on Goldmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the J3455 gets 47.3 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 1.2 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the J3455 gets 47.3 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 1.2 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
506c9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Apollo Lake
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1296
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
0 kB
Date
December 2012
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
12.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
47.34k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
6.02k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
3.49k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
2.01k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
1.47k (x0.53)
TOTAL
20.84k
12.98k (x0.62)
Multithread
G1610T
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
23.7k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
13.75k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
7.8k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
2.09k (x0.6)
TOTAL
38.59k
47.34k (x1.23)
Performance/W
G1610T
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
2370 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
1375 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
780 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
4734 points/W
Performance/GHz
G1610T
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
2619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
1517 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
872 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
637 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
5645 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4