Celeron E3300 vs Pentium E5200 (M0)
Description
Both models E3300 and E5200 (M0) are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 24.6 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the E3300 is 1.1 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 24.6 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the E3300 is 1.1 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
10676
Core
Wolfdale
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2048 kB
Date
August 2009
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
12.94k points
13.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.6k points
22.02k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3300
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
2.9k
2.88k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
6.38k
6.31k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
2.53k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.08k
1.35k (x1.25)
TOTAL
12.94k
13.08k (x1.01)
Multithread
E3300
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
5.76k
5.45k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
12.67k
11.5k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
4.02k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
1.05k (x1.03)
TOTAL
24.6k
22.02k (x0.9)
Performance/W
E3300
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
89 points/W
84 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
195 points/W
177 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
79 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
378 points/W
339 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3300
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/GHz
1154 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2551 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
1013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
431 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
5175 points/GHz
5231 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4