Celeron E3300 vs Xeon L5430
Description
Both models E3300 and L5430 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 24.6 k points while the L5430 gets 51.6 k points.
Summarizing, the L5430 is 2.1 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 24.6 k points while the L5430 gets 51.6 k points.
Summarizing, the L5430 is 2.1 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
1067a
Core
Wolfdale
Harpertown
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket 771
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
65 W
50 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x6144 kB
Date
August 2009
September 2008
Mean monothread perf.
12.94k points
15.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.6k points
51.64k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3300
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
2.9k
3.09k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
6.38k
6.86k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
2.66k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.08k
3.01k (x2.8)
TOTAL
12.94k
15.62k (x1.21)
Multithread
E3300
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
5.76k
12.4k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
12.67k
27.27k (x2.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
10.41k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
1.57k (x1.55)
TOTAL
24.6k
51.64k (x2.1)
Performance/W
E3300
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
89 points/W
248 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
195 points/W
545 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
79 points/W
208 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
31 points/W
TOTAL
378 points/W
1033 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3300
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/GHz
1160 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2551 points/GHz
2573 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
996 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
431 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
TOTAL
5175 points/GHz
5858 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4