Celeron E3300 vs Xeon E5-2651 v2
Description
The E3300 is based on Core architecture while the E5-2651 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 24.6 k points while the E5-2651 v2 gets 415 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2651 v2 is 16.9 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 24.6 k points while the E5-2651 v2 gets 415 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2651 v2 is 16.9 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
306e4
Core
Wolfdale
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/2
12/24
TDP
65 W
W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
30720 kB
Date
August 2009
October 2013
Mean monothread perf.
12.94k points
17.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.6k points
426.18k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3300
E5-2651 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
2.9k
6.75k (x2.33)
Test#2 (FP)
6.38k
6.05k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
2.61k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.08k
2.26k (x2.1)
TOTAL
12.94k
17.68k (x1.37)
Multithread
E3300
E5-2651 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
5.76k
168.18k (x29.22)
Test#2 (FP)
12.67k
159.6k (x12.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
77.04k (x14.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
10.19k (x10.05)
TOTAL
24.6k
415.01k (x16.87)
Performance/W
E3300
E5-2651 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
89 points/W