Celeron E3300 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The E3300 is based on Core architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 24.6 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 182.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 7.4 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 24.6 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 182.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 7.4 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
406f1
Core
Wolfdale
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
20480 kB
Date
August 2009
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
12.94k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.6k points
237.83k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E3300
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2.29k
2.6k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
5.87k
7.55k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
2.61k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
2.03k (x2)
TOTAL
11.66k
14.79k (x1.27)
Multithread
E3300
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
17.41k (x3.81)
Test#2 (FP)
11.66k
75.46k (x6.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.89k
26.25k (x5.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.04k
4.65k (x4.49)
TOTAL
22.16k
123.78k (x5.59)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3300
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2.9k
8.22k (x2.84)
Test#2 (FP)
6.38k
12.06k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
4.01k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.08k
2.89k (x2.68)
TOTAL
12.94k
27.18k (x2.1)
Multithread
E3300
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5.76k
61.34k (x10.66)
Test#2 (FP)
12.67k
90.21k (x7.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
26.2k (x5.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
4.62k (x4.56)
TOTAL
24.6k
182.37k (x7.41)
Performance/W
E3300
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
89 points/W
722 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
195 points/W
1061 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
79 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
54 points/W
TOTAL
378 points/W
2146 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3300
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/GHz
2739 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2551 points/GHz
4021 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
431 points/GHz
963 points/GHz
TOTAL
5175 points/GHz
9059 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4