| | | | | | |

Celeron E3300 vs Pentium T3400


Description
Both models E3300 and T3400 are based on Core architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 24.6 k points while the T3400 gets 14.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E3300 is 1.7 times faster than the T3400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
6fd
Core
Wolfdale
Merom-2M
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.167 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
August 2009
October 2008
Mean monothread perf.
12.94k points
8.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.6k points
14.91k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E3300
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.29k
1.86k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
5.87k
1.9k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
1.42k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
0.84k (x0.83)
TOTAL
11.66k
6.01k (x0.52)

Multithread

E3300

T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
4.04k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
11.66k
4.17k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.89k
3.55k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.04k
1.2k (x1.16)
TOTAL
22.16k
12.96k (x0.58)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3300
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.9k
2.49k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
6.38k
2.25k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
2.17k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.08k
1.14k (x1.06)
TOTAL
12.94k
8.05k (x0.62)

Multithread

E3300

T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
5.76k
4.98k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
12.67k
4.43k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
4.27k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
1.23k (x1.21)
TOTAL
24.6k
14.91k (x0.61)

Performance/W
E3300
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
89 points/W
142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
195 points/W
127 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
79 points/W
122 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
378 points/W
426 points/W

Performance/GHz
E3300
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2551 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
1002 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
431 points/GHz
526 points/GHz
TOTAL
5175 points/GHz
3714 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4