Celeron E3300 vs Core 2 Duo E7400
Description
Both models E3300 and E7400 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 24.6 k points while the E7400 gets 25.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E7400 is 1 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 24.6 k points while the E7400 gets 25.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E7400 is 1 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
1067a
Core
Wolfdale
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2009
October 2008
Mean monothread perf.
12.94k points
14.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.6k points
25.71k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E3300
E7400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.29k
2.54k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
5.87k
6.56k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
2.73k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
1.83k (x1.81)
TOTAL
11.66k
13.66k (x1.17)
Multithread
E3300
E7400
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
5.08k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
11.66k
13.07k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.89k
5.52k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.04k
1.62k (x1.57)
TOTAL
22.16k
25.29k (x1.14)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3300
E7400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.9k
3.19k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
6.38k
7.02k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
2.71k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.08k
1.39k (x1.29)
TOTAL
12.94k
14.31k (x1.11)
Multithread
E3300
E7400
Test#1 (Integers)
5.76k
6.02k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
12.67k
13.23k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
5.12k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
1.34k (x1.32)
TOTAL
24.6k
25.71k (x1.05)
Performance/W
E3300
E7400
Test#1 (Integers)
89 points/W
93 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
195 points/W
204 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
79 points/W
79 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
21 points/W
TOTAL
378 points/W
396 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3300
E7400
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/GHz
1139 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2551 points/GHz
2507 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
969 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
431 points/GHz
496 points/GHz
TOTAL
5175 points/GHz
5111 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4