| | | | | | |

Celeron E3300 vs N3450


Description
The E3300 is based on Core architecture while the N3450 is based on Goldmont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 24.6 k points while the N3450 gets 39.3 k points.

Summarizing, the N3450 is 1.6 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
506c9
Core
Wolfdale
Apollo Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1296
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
65 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
August 2009
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
12.94k points
13.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.6k points
39.33k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E3300
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
2.29k
1.54k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
5.87k
2.86k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
1.88k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
1.78k (x1.76)
TOTAL
11.66k
8.06k (x0.69)

Multithread

E3300

N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
5.91k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
11.66k
8.55k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.89k
5.48k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.04k
2.98k (x2.88)
TOTAL
22.16k
22.92k (x1.03)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3300
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
2.9k
5.95k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
6.38k
3.45k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
1.92k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.08k
1.78k (x1.65)
TOTAL
12.94k
13.11k (x1.01)

Multithread

E3300

N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
5.76k
21.38k (x3.72)
Test#2 (FP)
12.67k
9.84k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
5.25k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
2.86k (x2.82)
TOTAL
24.6k
39.33k (x1.6)

Performance/W
E3300
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
89 points/W
3564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
195 points/W
1640 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
79 points/W
875 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
477 points/W
TOTAL
378 points/W
6555 points/W

Performance/GHz
E3300
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/GHz
2706 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2551 points/GHz
1570 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
431 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
5175 points/GHz
5959 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4