Celeron E3300 vs G3900TE
Description
The E3300 is based on Core architecture while the G3900TE is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 24.6 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.
Summarizing, the G3900TE is 2 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 24.6 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.
Summarizing, the G3900TE is 2 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
506e3
Core
Wolfdale
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
2048 kB
Date
August 2009
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
12.94k points
27.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.6k points
49.34k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E3300
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
2.29k
2.36k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
5.87k
9.79k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
3.08k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
3.36k (x3.32)
TOTAL
11.66k
18.59k (x1.6)
Multithread
E3300
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
4.45k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
11.66k
18.16k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.89k
5.48k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.04k
3.5k (x3.38)
TOTAL
22.16k
31.59k (x1.43)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3300
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
2.9k
8.56k (x2.95)
Test#2 (FP)
6.38k
12.25k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
3.17k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.08k
3.35k (x3.11)
TOTAL
12.94k
27.33k (x2.11)
Multithread
E3300
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
5.76k
16.42k (x2.85)
Test#2 (FP)
12.67k
23.61k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
5.75k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
3.55k (x3.5)
TOTAL
24.6k
49.34k (x2.01)
Performance/W
E3300
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
89 points/W
469 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
195 points/W
675 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
79 points/W
164 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
378 points/W
1410 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3300
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/GHz
3724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2551 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
431 points/GHz
1455 points/GHz
TOTAL
5175 points/GHz
11885 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4