| | | | | | |

Celeron E3300 vs Atom x5-Z8350


Description
The E3300 is based on Core architecture while the x5-Z8350 is based on Airmont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 24.6 k points while the x5-Z8350 gets 18 k points.

Summarizing, the E3300 is 1.4 times faster than the x5-Z8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
406c4
Core
Wolfdale
Cherry Trail
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.44 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.72 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA592
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
65 W
2 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
August 2009
February 2016
Mean monothread perf.
12.94k points
6.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.6k points
17.99k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E3300
x5-Z8350
Test#1 (Integers)
2.29k
0.86k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
5.87k
1.39k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
1.21k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
0.82k (x0.81)
TOTAL
11.66k
4.28k (x0.37)

Multithread

E3300

x5-Z8350
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
2.73k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
11.66k
4.37k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.89k
3.74k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.04k
1.02k (x0.98)
TOTAL
22.16k
11.85k (x0.53)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3300
x5-Z8350
Test#1 (Integers)
2.9k
3.12k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
6.38k
1.77k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
1.13k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.08k
0.66k (x0.61)
TOTAL
12.94k
6.67k (x0.52)

Multithread

E3300

x5-Z8350
Test#1 (Integers)
5.76k
8.49k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
12.67k
5.26k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
3.3k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
0.94k (x0.93)
TOTAL
24.6k
17.99k (x0.73)

Performance/W
E3300
x5-Z8350
Test#1 (Integers)
89 points/W
4246 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
195 points/W
2629 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
79 points/W
1649 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
470 points/W
TOTAL
378 points/W
8995 points/W

Performance/GHz
E3300
x5-Z8350
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/GHz
1812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2551 points/GHz
1031 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
655 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
431 points/GHz
382 points/GHz
TOTAL
5175 points/GHz
3880 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4