| | | | | | |

Celeron E3300 vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The E3300 is based on Core architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 24.6 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1035T is 3.3 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
100fa0
Core
Wolfdale
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/6
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2009
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
12.94k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.6k points
80.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E3300
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.29k
1.98k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
5.87k
4.57k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
2.57k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
3.51k (x3.47)
TOTAL
11.66k
12.64k (x1.08)

Multithread

E3300

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
11.86k (x2.59)
Test#2 (FP)
11.66k
27.4k (x2.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.89k
15.39k (x3.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.04k
3.46k (x3.33)
TOTAL
22.16k
58.11k (x2.62)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3300
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.9k
5.17k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
6.38k
5.33k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
2.76k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.08k
3.51k (x3.26)
TOTAL
12.94k
16.77k (x1.3)

Multithread

E3300

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.76k
29.82k (x5.18)
Test#2 (FP)
12.67k
30.79k (x2.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
15.88k (x3.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
3.69k (x3.64)
TOTAL
24.6k
80.19k (x3.26)

Performance/W
E3300
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
89 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
195 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
79 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
378 points/W
844 points/W

Performance/GHz
E3300
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2551 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
431 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
5175 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4