Celeron E3300 vs A6 3500
Description
The E3300 is based on Core architecture while the 3500 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 24.6 k points while the 3500 gets 32.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500 is 1.3 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3300 gets a score of 24.6 k points while the 3500 gets 32.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500 is 1.3 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
300f10
Core
Wolfdale
Llano
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket FM1
Cores/Threads
2/2
3/3
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
3x64+3x64 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
3x1024 kB
Date
August 2009
August 2011
Mean monothread perf.
12.94k points
13.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.6k points
32.72k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3300
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
2.9k
4.75k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
6.38k
4.72k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
2.49k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.08k
1.69k (x1.57)
TOTAL
12.94k
13.65k (x1.05)
Multithread
E3300
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
5.76k
12.56k (x2.18)
Test#2 (FP)
12.67k
12.58k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
6.08k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.01k
1.49k (x1.47)
TOTAL
24.6k
32.72k (x1.33)
Performance/W
E3300
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
89 points/W
193 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
195 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
79 points/W
93 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
23 points/W
TOTAL
378 points/W
503 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3300
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/GHz
1978 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2551 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
1039 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
431 points/GHz
704 points/GHz
TOTAL
5175 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4